7 Comments
User's avatar
Max D's avatar

Shout out to Ethan Coleman, who I was gutted about when we couldn't keep him.

As for Bergkamp, his ability on the ball has never been questioned. As you rightly point out, we've seen a few flashes of that.

The question I have (and hopefully a full pre season addresses this) is around his fitness and intensity.

I think he'd be best served in this Bromley side as an #8 - Jude is higher energy, but perhaps he and Bergkamp can play together with a deeper lying destroyer behind them, giving us options if we don't want to play Louis for 90 minutes every week.

Expand full comment
Machel Hewitt's avatar

I was pondering the #8 position and whether he can do that. The only reason I cant say with any certainty is due to the exact premise of the article. We just havent seen enough to really know.

Expand full comment
Max D's avatar

Oh 100%.

Looking at his limited work so far, he reminds me a little of Loftus-Cheek at Chelsea. Great physical specimin, and could clearly play anywhere between a 6 and a 10, but I've not seen enough to quite get what his best position might be.

Perhaps he ends up playing deeper in a Stirk/Bingham role? Who's to say, but I'm excited!

Expand full comment
David Cheeseman's avatar

Well said.

Expand full comment
Alan Peppercorn's avatar

Nicely balanced Mash, thank you. His Father and indeed his surname are completely irrelevant as Mitchel is neither. All I know is that having watched him (briefly I accept), this lad can pick a pass and looks very comfortable with a ball at his feet. I hope he’s that bit of inspiration we need as an attacking midfielder but on this one, I’m backing AW’s judgement

Expand full comment
Machel Hewitt's avatar

Yep. I think he genuinely needs a pre season to get a proper run of games and find his place in the team.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
May 26, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Machel Hewitt's avatar

Yep 100% agree with this.

Expand full comment